Screening and diagnosis

Classification and risk stratification

Perioperative care

Quality improvement

Patient education

Nonpharmacologic interventions

Therapeutic procedures

Respiratory support

Follow-up and surveillance

Specific circumstances

Preventative measures

Medical management

Surgical interventions

Inpatient care

Diagnostic procedures

Diagnostic investigations

Insufficient evidence to make a recommendation.

Strongly favor this test or intervention.

The El-Ganzouri Risk Index measures the risk associated with endotracheal intubation by evaluating seven specific factors linked to anatomical features and patient history. Each factor is scored based on predefined criteria, with the cumulative score indicating the likelihood of a difficult intubation. 

The key parameters assessed are:

- Mouth opening: 
  - >= 4 cm: 0 points
  - < 4 cm: 1 point

- Thyromental distance:
  - > 6.5 cm: 0 points
  - 6.0-6.5 cm: 1 point
  - < 6.0 cm: 2 points

- Modified Mallampati class:
  - Class I (soft palate, fauces, uvula, and pillars visible): 0 points
  - Class II (soft palate, fauces, and uvula visible): 1 point
  - Class III (soft palate and base of uvula visible): 2 points
  - Class IV (soft palate not visible): 2 points

- Neck movement:
  - > 90 degrees: 0 points
  - 80-90 degrees: 1 point
  - < 80 degrees: 2 points

- Ability to prognath:
  - Yes: 0 points
  - No: 1 point

- Weight:
  - < 90 kg: 0 points
  - 90-110 kg: 1 point
  - > 110 kg: 2 points

- History of difficult intubation:
  - None: 0 points
  - Questionable: 1 point
  - Definite: 2 points

To calculate the total score, convert each patient response using the scoring system above, and sum the scores from all parameters. The total score ranges from 0 to 12.

Interpretation of the total score:

- A score less than 4 suggests a low risk of difficult endotracheal intubation, implying routine airway management plans are sufficient.
- A score of 4 or more indicates a high risk of difficulty, signaling the need for enhanced preparation, alternative techniques, or additional resources during intubation. 

This systematic evaluation assists healthcare providers in anticipating and mitigating potential challenges during airway management procedures.

The El-Ganzouri Risk Index (EGRI) is a clinical scoring system used to predict the difficulty of endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing surgery. This calculator is particularly useful in the field of anesthesiology, where it aids in preoperative assessment and planning. The EGRI takes into account several factors including patient history, physical examination findings, and specific anatomical characteristics to generate a score. A higher score indicates a higher risk of difficult intubation. It is important to note that this index should not be used in emergency situations where rapid sequence intubation is required, as it requires a thorough patient assessment. Additionally, it may not be applicable in pediatric populations or in patients with certain anatomical abnormalities or conditions that significantly alter airway anatomy.

El-Ganzouri Risk Index for endotracheal intubation (EGRI)

The Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) is a tool for assessing pain levels in intubated patients by observing three specific behavioral indicators: facial expression, upper limb movements, and compliance with mechanical ventilation. Each behavior is linked to a set of descriptive options, with each option assigned a numerical score.

The scoring is as follows:

- Facial Expression:
  - Relaxed: 1
  - Partially tightened: 2
  - Fully tightened: 3
  - Grimacing: 4

- Upper Limb Movements:
  - No movement: 1
  - Partially bent: 2
  - Fully bent with finger flexion: 3
  - Permanently retracted: 4

- Compliance with Mechanical Ventilation:
  - Tolerating movement: 1
  - Coughing but tolerating ventilation for most of the time: 2
  - Fighting ventilator: 3
  - Unable to control ventilation: 4

For each of the three indicators, the caregiver selects the option that best describes the patient's current behavior, and the associated scores are recorded. These scores are then summed to produce a total score, which can range from 3 to 12.

The total score guides the interpretation of the patient's pain level:

- A score ranging from 3 to 5 suggests "No or mild pain," indicating acceptable discomfort levels.
- A score from 6 to 12 reflects "Unacceptable amount of pain," prompting consideration for additional sedation and/or analgesia.

This scoring system provides healthcare providers with a straightforward method to evaluate and respond to the pain status of intubated patients effectively.

The Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) is a clinical calculator used for assessing pain in intubated patients, specifically those who are unable to communicate verbally due to mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU). The BPS is a valuable tool for healthcare providers as it helps in the objective evaluation of pain, which is crucial for appropriate pain management and improving patient comfort. 

The BPS assesses three behavioral domains: facial expression, upper limb movements, and compliance with ventilation. Each domain is scored from 1 to 4, with a total score ranging from 3 (no pain) to 12 (maximum pain). 

The BPS is not applicable to patients who are sedated or paralyzed, as their ability to exhibit behavioral responses to pain is impaired. Additionally, it may not be suitable for patients with neurological impairments or those who have received neuromuscular blocking agents, as these conditions can also affect the patient's ability to express pain behaviorally.

Behavioral Pain Scale for pain assessment in intubated patients (BPS)

The Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) is designed to assess pain in patients who are unable to communicate verbally. This tool evaluates pain through four indicators: intubation status and vocalization or compliance with the ventilator, facial expression, body movements, and muscle tension. Each indicator is associated with specific responses, each mapped to a score. Here's how each is assessed:

- **Intubation status and vocalization or compliance with the ventilator**:
  - Not intubated and talking in normal tone or no sound: score of 0
  - Not intubated and sighing, moaning: score of 1
  - Not intubated and crying out, sobbing: score of 2
  - Intubated and tolerating ventilator or movement: score of 0
  - Intubated and coughing but tolerating: score of 1
  - Intubated and fighting ventilator: score of 2

- **Facial expression**:
  - Relaxed, neutral: score of 0
  - Tense: score of 1
  - Grimacing: score of 2

- **Body movements**:
  - Absence of movements: score of 0
  - Protection: score of 1
  - Restlessness: score of 2

- **Muscle tension**:
  - Relaxed: score of 0
  - Tense, rigid: score of 1
  - Very tense or rigid: score of 2

The scores from each of these indicators are summed to yield a total CPOT score. Here's what the scores indicate about the patient's pain level:

- A total score between 0 and 2 suggests "Minimal or no pain present."
- A total score of 3 or above suggests an "Unacceptable amount of pain," which may require further intervention such as sedation or analgesia.

This tool helps in quantifying pain for patients unable to communicate, facilitating critical decision-making in patient care.

The Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) is a clinical calculator used in the critical care setting. It is specifically designed for assessing pain in patients who are unable to communicate their pain, such as those who are intubated, sedated, or unconscious. The CPOT evaluates four different aspects: facial expressions, body movements, muscle tension, and compliance with the ventilator for intubated patients or vocalization for extubated patients. Each category is scored from 0-2, with a total score ranging from 0-8. Higher scores indicate a higher level of pain. The clinical utility of the CPOT is to guide pain management in critically ill patients, ensuring adequate pain control and minimizing unnecessary use of analgesics. There are no specific exclusion criteria for its use, but it may be less accurate in patients with certain neurological conditions that affect facial expression or muscle tone.

Rapid sequence induction and intubation

Guidelines

Key sources